-
1 ReplyEdited by Widd: 8/6/2014 6:35:57 AMI think it should stay as is because I plan on doing a bunch of both. Pretty much anytime we aren't running strikes/raids I will be doing pvp. I would like to actually talk instead of just commenting back and forth.
-
We should keep the title/ranking system as is. The current ranking system seems just right, but by creating different titles for PvE and PvP players, things would get confusing.
-
1 ReplyI enjoy the way titles/ranks are organized right now. The fun in having a non traditional system is very evident from the descriptions. I also think having 2 separate ranking systems will get too confusing, especially if we have a good number of players that participate in both pve and pvp. From my understanding, the current descriptions encompassed both pve and pvp, which should suffice since we aren't going to be super strict about a normal "command" structure at the moment. Anyway, that's just my two cents. Coming from someone who doesn't have a lot of experience with normal clan structures, this system makes sense to me.
-
As someone who commented on the titles a little bit, I've sort of redacted my statements as it seems most of us are here for the raids anyways. I will say though, it would be cool, whether its a title or rank to just show off your Crucible progress.... So maybe we maintain a Title .. but then something else will denote a multiplayer rank or team or squad... if that wasnt all too convuluted lol