Destiny ONE vs Elder scrolls ONE, not Elder scrolls FIVE
new game from scratch takes more time than a sequel so same dev time less content is normal.
English
-
Arena>>>>>>>>denshitty
-
Skyrim was made from scratch, idiot.
-
Edited by SEV THE DEV: 11/6/2014 6:41:12 PMthats why it has less content than the older ones ... [spoiler]Story mode beaten in 5 hours when i played it without doing the bounties/side quests[/spoiler] [spoiler]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQxojWRpayY someone else beat it under an hour[/spoiler]
-
And I beat the story in Destiny on the highest difficulty in under 3 hours so what is your point?
-
Edited by SEV THE DEV: 11/6/2014 7:58:46 PMmy point is that if skyrim and destiny take just as long to make, but destiny has less content, the other dev time was for the online aspect of the game. skyrim had 100% time to use on content. if you look at all the problems ESO is having with multiplayer then you understand the lacking content. my other post [quote]they didn't have to spend that dev time to make it multiplayer, have you seen ESO? not trying to fanboi or defend here, just trying to show you there is no perfect game ...[/quote]
-
Edited by A Saturnalia: 11/6/2014 8:03:28 PMThe dev team for Destiny spent probably less time then Bethesda did on ESO for Multiplayer. Seeing that a lot of their previous titles surrounded around Multiplayer they have more experience. This is also a post comparing Destiny to Skyrim, not ESO.
-
Still more content than Destiny....ouch
-
Edited by SEV THE DEV: 11/6/2014 6:44:35 PMthey didn't have to spend that dev time to make it multiplayer, have you seen ESO? not trying to fanboi or defend here, just trying to show you there is no perfect game ...
-
No one expected a perfect game, just more substantial. . .
-
fair enough, glad we can agree on that ;)
-
So you want to compare a 2014 video game... to a game from the early 90s? Too bad, because Destiny still loses. The first Elder Scrolls games make Destiny look like a nerf gun fight inside a cardboard box; they were MASSIVE. Piss poor graphics, but still a lot bigger than Destiny.
-
no i mean if you compare how much better skyrim is than the first elder scroll. image how much the fourth and final destiny will be 10 years from now compared to the first one.
-
Oh, you mean after 4 more installments over several years, I might get a game that is almost on par with skyrim? Sounds like a good deal /sarcasm
-
you guys wont get it, cod 1 wasn't the best of the series elder scroll 1 wasn't the best of the series Halo 1 wasn't the best of the series GTA 1 wasn't the best of the series AC 1 wasn't the best of the series PS 1 and the first xbox were not the best of the series the first cars were not the best of the series get it now? things get better over time. like the game, play it, don't like it, don't play it. there is a reason i don't play CoD, there is a reason i don't have any idea how the CoD forum looks.
-
[spoiler]I actually like ac1 the best so gtfo desticle[/spoiler]
-
Edited by SEV THE DEV: 11/6/2014 8:03:39 PMopinion, i honestly think the ezio ones had more story and content than the first but that my opinion. i also think the AC3 AC4 were not worth the time, i really just played them to say i played all the AC games =/. but to the point thats why we have opinions... Edit: also im not trying to say desticle is perfect, but there is no perfect game ever or ever will be so if you want a perfect game, stop playing games, or get used to it.