Why don't they add another year of development to really polish it up? Maybe an extra year under their belt can help draw out more of the XB1's potential.
Honestly, with such a short development time and with what we've seen from Halo 4.... don't expect anything groundbreaking or revolutionary. My prediction is a slightly above average sci-fi shooter that you'll grow bored with after 4 months. This is a fate that Halo does not deserve. They should stop making Halo games, and do the series justice by continuing it with a book series that is preferably written by Eric Nylund.
English
-
Hey man, as long as the campaign quality keeps rolling...
-
yeah it sucks man. I fear we are going to yet again get another rushed title. I'll be surprised if we don't.
-
[quote]Why don't they add another year of development to really polish it up? Maybe an extra year under their belt can help draw out more of the XB1's potential.[/quote] Welcome to being tied down by contractual obligations and business. It's not the developer's fault.
-
I don't know. Maybe Halo 4 suffered because 343 was working on Halo 5 at the same time as Halo 4. There is a chance 343, being owned by Microsoft, had early access to the XB1. I've always believed this is same reason why Halo 2 suffered the terrible ending and all the glitches that were left in the game. Because Bungie got a hold of the 360 early on and started working on the next Halo (possibly forced by Microsoft) before the current one was ready.