Well, the Death Star before roj had only one weakness on paper....the hole in the shell. The traveler has many holes so unfortunately I'm sticking with the Death Star simply because its name says it all...Death Star
Yes I'm aware it got destroyed but it was basically icing on the cake as the it was more of an intimidation thing as their fleet dominated well before its construction...the traveler had to burn basically 99.5% of its power to save the human race; and still failing to meet the goal of wiping the threat. What this survey should say in my opinion is traveler or halo array as the halo array would have dropped a large chocolate fudge dragon on both as it was activated and successfully eliminated the flood threat with the Milky Way however, it's effect on flood in surrounding galaxies not so much it's like this to me
Traveler (sacrifice power and failed as the darkness is still present)< Death Star (planet destroyer and ender of planetary population(s) it was tested on more than one planet< halo array ( the purge mechanism)
Please disagree as I like the conversation curious to say of anyone agrees with me lol
English
-
The hole in the death stars hole was important because it lead straight to a giant reactor. It would be pretty close But I would have to go with the traveler.
-
[quote]It would be pretty close[/quote] The Traveler can't even attack, though.
-
We are not sure of that but it was one hole in the Death Star. And it was attacked before just not clarified in the movies by the rebels but they failed...it can destroy planets and entire populations in a matter of seconds...the traveler failed at accomplishing that and almost destroyed itself in the process...now if the argument was about sacrifice then it would go to the traveler as it sacrificed much of its power to saving a species
-
I hear a debate ;) anyone agree or disagree with Sev?
-
I disagree I dare you to debate this
-
Ha, take it up with that guy ;)