{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by A Forum Cop:
11/13/2013 12:05:07 AM
13
Question for agnostic atheists...
If evidence in support of a God were to be discovered, would you believe in God?
I do not claim to have said proof, and this is a hypothetical scenario.
-
Believe in a god? Yup. A god is a rather loose definition, to which I consider a god to be a sentient being with supernatural powers (whether natural or artificial) that has a very long life span. The life span is what separates gods from spirits and wizards. The distinction between spirits and wizards is wizards are living humans, as ghosts fall under spirits.
-
There is no such thing as an agnostic atheist. Most agnostics are atheists, and all atheists are technically agnostics.
-
It would need to be some pretty rock solid evidence. But if so, yes.
-
Absolutely
-
[quote]If evidence in support of a God were to be discovered, would you believe in God?[/quote]I would think it depends on what you mean by "in support of". Does this evidence [b]prove[/b] a god exists? Or just [b]suggest[/b] a god exists?
-
Sure, I would.
-
If the evidence was compelling, I'd be interested in it.
-
If it was conclusive, how could I possibly not believe it?
-
Agnostic Atheist? Is that like a bisexual gay man? Anyways, were there proof of a god that was irrefutable and independently verifiable, then I, and any atheist, would have to believe. You can't deny facts.
-
1 Reply[quote]I [b]do[/b] claim to have said proof, and this is a hypothetical scenario.[/quote] Did you mistype there? If you do have proof, then it's not a hypothetical scenario.
-
If said evidence is falsifiable/testable, and comes with the confirmation, most likely.
-
I'm watching this space.
-
Why would't they believe in a god if it were to be proven true? Do you mean would they FOLLOW God?
