JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

originally posted in:Secular Sevens
Edited by Baph: 8/8/2013 4:56:01 AM
3
I do wonder how one would go about isolating the fundamental principle of self-loathing at the very core of libertarian values that drives the dialectic conflict with the postgender feminist ideal. I would venture that it would be socioconstructive methodology by which we would approach this solution. I find that you're quote fails to adequately account for this, and so I must say that find the thesis to be illogical.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I'm sorry, but such a position is fundamentally misguided. Refer to the following excerpt from an esteemed paper: [quote]“Society is fundamentally unattainable,” says Sartre; however, according to Dahmus , it is not so much society that is fundamentally unattainable, but rather the futility of society. But if dialectic dematerialism holds, we have to choose between modernism and neocultural feminism. Several discourses concerning a modernist paradox exist. “Class is impossible,” says Debord. Thus, Marx uses the term ‘the postdialectic paradigm of context’ to denote not, in fact, desituationism, but subdesituationism. Many theories concerning postcultural dialectic theory may be discovered. The characteristic theme of the works of Spelling is the role of the observer as artist. Therefore, Debord uses the term ‘textual theory’ to denote the bridge between society and class. The main theme of Wilson’s critique of postcapitalist construction is a self-justifying totality. Thus, Baudrillard’s model of textual theory holds that sexual identity, perhaps surprisingly, has intrinsic meaning. Sartre suggests the use of the postdialectic paradigm of context to analyse and modify class. In a sense, Baudrillard uses the term ‘Sartreist existentialism’ to denote not narrative, but neonarrative. The subject is contextualised into a textual theory that includes truth as a paradox.[/quote]

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by die wily: 8/8/2013 4:48:34 AM
    I'm really shocked that you're against this, Baph. I though defensive dialectical libertarianism was your bag, but you apparently got caught up in the superficial anti-literalistic tone of the quote.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • You would defend the feministic principles in dialectical libertarianism.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon