This thread is inspired by another: view original post
No seriously,
If gay people choose to be gay, when do straight people choose to be straight?
My point is that orientation is not a choice, it's biological. There's even [url=http://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/news/20060626/birth-order-may-affect-homosexuality]scientific evidence[/url] that younger brothers are more likely to be gay than their older brothers. [url=http://io9.com/5967426/scientists-confirm-that-homosexuality-is-not-genetic--but-it-arises-in-the-womb]Also, there doesn't seem to be any genetic causes for homosexuality.[/url]
Debate.
English
#Offtopic
-
6 Replies in this Sub-Thread[quote] Also, there doesn't seem to be any genetic causes for homosexuality. [/quote] Mutation it is then, there is no biological advantage to being gay, it cannot be passed on as a trait, and they don't choose.. Congrats, you just labeled being gay as a "genetic -blam!- up", nice job, dick.
-
Edited by Elrond Hubbard: 7/25/2013 3:18:22 AMAnimals do it to. It's a part of nature. EDIT: Though I admit, on second thought I probably didn't need to include that link.
-
So because it's a part of nature that makes it okay and NOT a mutation? Choose your words carefully, I can bend both the mutation argument and the nature argument into attack your own claims. Just because something is natural, doesn't make it right, and just because it's in nature, doesn't mean it can't be a mutation.
-
-