JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

5/17/2013 8:56:06 PM
21
I'm not going to bother clicking the link, but is there actual evidence that what CBS claims is true? Because all your post says is that CBS is claiming these things. Also, those differences don't seem like they would be very important, though I'd suspect the fact that they might have been changed is more important than the actual changes.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Only way to figure out if they have evidence is to click the link. Basically, you're asking the OP: "Show me evidence, but I won't look at your evidence that you placed in front of me."

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Took a while for you to respond. I would only be asking that of the OP if he placed evidence in front of me. It's a waste of my valuable time to go searching through who knows how many links to find information that might not even be there, and any information that I might find, wouldn't be information he had given us in his post. It's not bad to ask someone who posts a claim like this to back up their claim in the post itself. Within the OP, there was no evidence whatsoever. I think most of us know that if we tried to write an argumentative essay in school about a claim, if we simply posted a claim and said,"Hey, find the evidence yourself from my works cited list", we'd likely get a failing grade. It's not as preposterous as you make it seem.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by Section Ratio General: 5/19/2013 12:03:47 AM
    I'm not even the OP. He literally gave the link to the post; a HUFFINGTON link. You're saying there's no evidence when Huffington Post is a great source for news compared to other news outlets. Edit: There's also a video and slideshow in the link. If you want evidence, click the link and view the evidence.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote]the OP if he[/quote] I never said you were the OP... I know he gave a link. Did you not read my post?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Did you click the link? There's literally a video by CBS and a slideshow in the link and on the front page.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Let me reiterate in case you did not catch it the first time. Did you not read my post?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote]I'm not going to bother clicking the link, but is there actual evidence that what CBS claims is true?[/quote]There's a video in the link that has the coverage from CBS. Literally, only 48 seconds long and shows the evidence. [quote]but is there actual evidence that what CBS claims is true?[/quote]Literally, only 48 seconds long and it's in the first 20 seconds of the video where they start showing evidence. [quote]Because all your post says is that CBS is claiming these things.[/quote]First 20 seconds. [quote]Also, those differences don't seem like they would be very important, though I'd suspect the fact that they might have been changed is more important than the actual changes.[/quote]The White House version is objective. The Republican one completely derails and changes the meaning completely.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Good job! You almost got it right! You responded to the wrong post and, except for the last past (which is irrelevant to the "argument" we are having), you responded with points that I only need to say "Read the post I was actually talking about" to counter!

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote]Did you not read my post?[/quote] Except you weren't being specific. Ergo, I could read any post you made, even one when you first made your account and interpret it as that. Being specific always helps rather than making yourself look like a massive ass. [url=http://www.technobuffalo.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/The-more-you-know.png]Here's a link for you btw.[/url]

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • All that did was make you like an idiot. My first post wasn't even directed towards you. You responded. I responded to that. Then you responded again. Why would you assume that my next post asking if you had read my post was referring to my first post? That makes absolutely no sense. There was no need to be more specific. It was a very simple question. But really, good job dodging everything. Except, not really. At this point, it seems that either you are not very bright or you are deliberately posting in this manner to get some sort of specific response from me. At this rate, I can always mute you if you refuse to be intelligent about this.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • You asked the same thing in the first post as you did in the second post. Let me summarize it up for you. "I see the link, but I'm not going to click it, but I want to see evidence." Hm, let me try to put what you posted in a metaphor, or something that seems much more accurate. What you said makes as much sense as someone denying that an iceburg sunk the Titanic. Either that, or claiming that there's no such thing as gravity. Then again, it has to be ignorance. You won't view evidence that's placed in front of you unless it benefits you. Great, welcome to the Extreme Right Wing part of politics. Take your seat over there, the butthurt doctor will see you soon.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Wow, you really didn't read my post, did you?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Wow, you really didn't read the link, did you?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Do you think copying my post is to your advantage? Sadly, no. If you had read my post, you would understand that. Then again, you seem like you really might be too stupid to understand it, even if you did read my post. Perhaps you can get your parents to explain it to you. But wait, they spawned you. They probably aren't that much better. The teachers you've had apparently haven't taught you anything, either. You probably don't have any friends, or at most friends who are even worse than you. Hmm...it seems like you might be stuck, then. Sorry I can't help you with your lack of an ability to comprehend anything, even simple concepts. Unfortunately, if you don't find some way to improve yourself by the time you reply to me again, I will be forced to have to mute you. I'm not the most patient of people, and prolonged exposure to whatever kind of subhuman you are might cause me to lose my cool. But in that case, I'm sure you can find someone else to try to practice communication with before your brain finishes its complete atrophy.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by Section Ratio General: 5/19/2013 1:12:12 AM
    Actually, it did. You're making a great wall of China post, yet you're avoiding the simple question I asked in my first post to you. Got to love that hypocrisy, so overpowered. Next time, if you try to debate in a political thread, try viewing the evidence AND responding to the first question before you even try to make circular logic. It'll save you about 10 and a half minutes of embarrassment. Still, do I even have to respond to you? It seems that you're blocking out all forms of responses with, "NA NA NA NA NA I CANT HEAR YOU LONG WALL OF TEXT". So much for debating. But then again, you can't really debate with people who have that superiority complex online. Edit: [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superiority_complex]By the way, here's some education for you. Try accepting it, since you do suffer from a form of the superiority complex syndrome known as "pseudointelligent guy on the internet".[/url]

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote]Actually, it did.[/quote] Nope. I direct to my post that I've been referring you to this entire time, yet you have ignored. [quote]You're making a great wall of China post, yet you're avoiding the simple question I asked in my first post to you.[/quote] Huh? [quote]Only way to figure out if they have evidence is to click the link. Basically, you're asking the OP: "Show me evidence, but I won't look at your evidence that you placed in front of me."[/quote] Yeah, that's a question. [quote]It seems that you're blocking out all forms of responses with, "NA NA NA NA NA I CANT HEAR YOU LONG WALL OF TEXT".[/quote] Read ANY of my posts, please. None of them are in any way similar to that. If you have trouble reading, take a class. [quote]It'll save you about 10 and a half minutes of embarrassment. [/quote] If the previous statement could at all be applied to this "argument", perhaps. Unfortunately, it can not. You have thoroughly made an embarrassment of yourself by even starting this "argument". [quote]But then again, you can't really debate with people who have that superiority complex online.[/quote] Well, my response to this is: [quote]Got to love that hypocrisy, so overpowered.[/quote] You've shown yourself to be an imbecile who knows nothing about anything and everything he says. You ignore everything [i]I[/i] say, simply because you know you can not argue against it. I only mute idiots with no hope of improvement. You have proven without a doubt that you fall into that category. Have fun with whatever idiotic statement you make in response, because I won't be reading it. You probably won't read this far, but I'll try to give you some advice: It will only be detrimental to you. Please don't worsen this situation for you even more, it has sunken far enough already. So, anyways, goodbye. O you of so little a mind, attention span, sense, reason...well, you get the idea. Not you personally, I'm directing that last phrase towards any other people who might read this "Wall of China". At this point, I hope it is pretty obvious that I'm mocking you by still typing. But really, I'm muting you.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Nah, just using what you use. Then you get super defensive about it. Trying to cover up some inferiority or something? It's okay, we won't laugh at you [i]that[/i] hard.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • So let me guess, you still didn't look at the link.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Please refrain from entering something you apparently know nothing about. If you want to say something about what I've posted in this topic, please read my posts. The link is completely irrelevant to this conversation, a fact you and the other guy seem to ignore.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • The conversation stems from your refusal to look at the link, and thus the evidence. But by all means go on another obtuse and verbose diatribe and then announce that you've muted me. The problem's still with you. Nobody's fooled.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I would sure hope nobody is fooled, because that would mean everybody would be on my side. That, I'm sure, is not the case. The conversation did not stem from my refusal to look at the link, as I never refused to look at it. As you can tell most of the posts that are mine are of me telling him to look at my first response to his reply, which he refused to do. My first response to him was about how the OP himself hadn't given us any evidence in his post, as in the text, itself. That's what the conversation stemmed from, not me refusing to look at a link. Also, that last part is [i]very[/i] helpful to your statement, so go ahead, you should post like that more.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon