But for reals, climate change isn't real and humans have nothing to do with it...
English
-
Nothing here implied humans effect climate change.
-
Giant increases in CO2 levels in the past two hundred years? CO2 levels exceeding the past million years in terms of the CO2 cycles?
-
And? There's no evidence that is having any impact at all on weather. Temperature is not driven directly by CO2.
-
[quote]And? There's no evidence that is having any impact at all on weather. Temperature is not driven directly by CO2.[/quote] -Greenhouse effect -Sun's systems have been inputted into the model. Argumentum ad Solar has never been valid. -So what you are basically saying is 99% of climatologists are wrong. With no evidence to support your claim.
-
I wouldn't argue with Camnator unless you want to lose brain cells. I'd make a bet with full confidence that if we placed Camnator and NDT in the same room and had the topic of Astrophysics, Camnator would say that NDT is completely wrong about it.
-
-
Neil deGrasse Tyson. Whoops, used the wrong middle initial.
-
Missing many variable, including the fact carbon dioxide can also cancel out radiation from entering. Not even near 99%, and they don't all agree humans are a factor.
-
Our magnetic field already blocks most of the radiation coming in. The only radiation you should be concerned about is UV radiation, which you need to form Vitamin D but can give you sunburns.
-
Edited by Quantum: 5/16/2013 9:33:15 AMYou do realize that 90%+ of climatologists have ruled out all other factors right? As in CO2 is the main cause of man made climate change, do something about it.
-
Except there is no proof and you're still exaggerating. There are MANY factors for climate change. It has always and will always happen. The warmest point in our history happened when we had no cars.
-
You're right, he's [i]under exaggerating.[/i] Around 97% of climate scientists agree that cilmate change is man-made. [url=http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.abstract]Source[/url] [url=http://content.usatoday.com/communities/sciencefair/post/2010/06/scientists-overwhelmingly-believe-in-man-made-climate-change/1#.UZTieSvirfE]Source[/url]
-
Just so we're all clear here, could you detail exactly what you would classify as proof of anthropogenic climate change?
-
Don't you mean anthropological? What I'm saying is neither side is proven, that's exactly my point. We have trouble predicting weather three days ahead but suddenly we know we're the cause of the Earths demise? You give humanity far too much credit. Both sides have evidence and many things about global warming have been debunked, along with the IPCC lying about data and the scandals they have, we are FAR from saying we are definitely causing the Earth to accelerate in heating.
-
That's not what I asked. What is the standard of proof that you require before you would accept anthropogenic climate change as fact?
-
Source?
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtevF4B4RtQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8s47y8ZGOmI
-
-Infowars -LEL -The opinion of one man claiming a great conspiracy with little evidence. You aren't even trying anymore, are you?
-
Infowars? I don't remember these videos containing Infowars, I might have grabbed the wrong one.
-
4real