originally posted in:Secular Sevens
Theyre actually less environmentally friendly because they are harder to recycle.
Thats why I dont buy them. You prick. Get educated.
English
-
Not relevant to the study.
-
Actually it is. Because its a sham. And I'm sure these people know that.
-
If they're a sham, they're a sham regardless of whether they have a sticker on them or not and there should therefore be no difference between the sticker bulbs and the non-sticker bulbs. But alas, there was. So no, it's not relevant. Become scientifically literate.
-
He's not saying that bulb is a sham. He's saying that environmentally "beneficial" items in the past, have in certain cases, been worse than the standard counterpart.
-
Citation needed.
-
What is he supposed to cite?
-
I'm asking him to cite his sources to support the claim that he doesn't buy them. I'm also asking him to cite his sources for the claim that New Radical is a prick. And of course, I'm asking him to cite the source where he wants NewRadical to get educated. However, I was not asking him to cite multiple scientific peer-reviewed sources for the claim that they are less environmentally friendly because they are harder to recycle. Nope, not at all.
-
Sarcasm isn't becoming when it's done poorly.
-
^^^^^^Is butthurt.^^^^^^