JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

originally posted in: Who Believes 9/11 Was an Inside Job?
3/27/2013 1:03:25 AM
8
It could have been. Only an idiot would believe everything they hear and not have any doubts despite the claims against it.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • My question was: What would be the advantage of faking a collapse over causing a real collapse? Why not just cause real collapses if you are going to go that far to begin with? Makes no sense.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Well that would just be a waste of planes and more people dead. Not to mention ramming planes into a building doesn't seem like an intuitive approach to make a building collapse vertically.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • They could've just as easily planted large bombs and said "the terrorists used explosives to take down the WTC". The government has smart people in it. They would know that, if they went with this approach, there would be some discrepancies about whether or not the planes were actually able to take down the towers. Why not just say "they used bombs"?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by Lincoln Osiris: 3/27/2013 1:17:12 AM
    Why would you worry about how many planes wasted or people dead? What difference would the way it collapses make?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Because they had to minimize the death tole. That's why they caused a vertical collapse because it causes the least amount of damage in the city and least amount of deaths as opposed to it toppling over.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • What would be the motive in minimizing the death toll? You would cause less deaths by not faking a terrorist attack. Where is the logic?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • It had to be done. That being the case, you might as well try to at least limit the death toll. Frankly minimizing the damage to one the most prosperous cities in the world was probably the biggest factor.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • LOL. Perfect6 logic. DERP.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon