cuz when it's done to females it more often than not causes permanent and debilitiating nerve damage and often disfigurement. In the [b]best[/b] case scenarios it causes its intended consequence of making females unable to enjoy sex, which is in it's own right unethical.
Why is internet so stupid?
English
-
[quote]causes permanent and debilitiating nerve damage and often disfigurement. [/quote] [quote]causes its intended consequence of making females unable to enjoy sex, which is in it's own right unethical.[/quote]>implying all those things don't happen to males Please tell me this is a satirical post.
-
These consequences might happen to males, but I don't think that makes a case for it being ideal for females. I believe it's probably far more detrimental to females, and in much much higher instances. Is male circumcision backwards thinking tradition? Yup, but so is shaving our faces, and I'm an heir to both traditions.
-
[quote][quote]causes permanent and debilitiating nerve damage and often disfigurement. [/quote] [quote]causes its intended consequence of making females unable to enjoy sex, which is in it's own right unethical.[/quote]>implying all those things don't happen to males Please tell me this is a satirical post.[/quote]this post/QFT. it's a pointless ritual for lazy barbarians.