America wasn't needed in WW1 Britain and France was already winning, the 6 months of American participation was just an extra push against tired and hungry germans.
Mexico would not have been a problem.
English
-
You twit, Britain and France were no where near being in the position to win the war on their own, they hadn't even managed to push into Germany. U.S. Reinforcements allowed them to push across lines and eventually wrestle Germany into a strategically unfavourable position. The UK would have been required to conscript more 'colonists' from India, Irelan, and other 'unfavourables' to bulk the front lines and make pushes across the line. That would have resulted in massive casualties that would cause much civil unrest and further issues for the UK.
-
The Dildact says lets pretend US has its penor all over europe, the Mexico decides to have some suprise buttsecks.
-
Oh really? I swear every post that involves a world war just under mines America and it pisses me off. We fought against very tough odds, not "tired and hungry Germans" get your facts straight.
-
I agree you fought tough odd's but for 3 years French and British forces where busy fighting and out producing the German war machine and staving the population of Germany and its military. America joined at to what we see as the end of the war or at least 6 months before meaning Fresh American troops fighting weakened, tired and hungry German troops caused the war to end faster than it would have.
-
The Dildact says if while America was focused on providing support overseas, then suddenly Mexican army invades the US from the south, then America would have a problem. The Dildact says Mexico could have attacked America while they were distracted to win back their lost territory while America was distracted regardless of whether or not Germany lost.