Halo 4 is a much better game than Reach and ODST. That's all I care about.
English
-
Reach constantly had higher population than Halo 4 has had lately. lol.. As bad as Reach is/was, H4 is worse. Population count doesn't lie.
-
I don't care about that, multiplayer has sucked since Halo 3. You can't rate the game based just on how many children play the multiplayer for each game. In my opinion that just means more people have bad taste than I do. Some of us still play games for the story.
-
Too bad they use population count to judge what's the popular game these days. As sad as it is, single player isn't even an aspect to judge many games with a multiplayer function. It's pathetic yes.. but the point remains as much as you may not like to hear it, population count does indeed matter. You may not agree, I may not agree, but as they say, the proof is in the numbers.
-
You cannot prove an opinion. Those numbers only state that more people enjoy the Reach Multiplayer over Halo 4. The games aren't based solely on their multiplayer components, but as a whole game. Video game reviewers don't rate the games based solely on multiplayer, they review everything. In my OPINION, Halo ODST and Reach cannot match Halo 4. Take your numbers to someone who cares because they don't phase my opinion.
-
Population Numbers aren't an opinion. They are fact. Don't like facts, fine, move along and don't bother replying, because you'll get the same response.
-
Edited by HaloTitan: 1/11/2013 7:52:32 PMYou're obviously not reading what I'm saying. It's like I'm debating with a child. Oh wait, I probably am. For the final time. All those numbers state to me is MORE PEOPLE LIKE REACH'S MULTIPLAYER OVER HALO 4's. I will give you that, but that doesn't make the game "better" because all components of the game are not being judged. You'd be surprised how many people, people just like me, play the game for the STORY. Where are those numbers? There aren't any? Then your point is moot. You cannot judge a game solely on ONE COMPONENT, you judge it based on ALL COMPONENTS. And like I said, you cannot PROVE an opinion. Those numbers you keep trying to push on me mean NOTHING. Again, they mean NOTHING to me. I could care less because in the end, whether or not you continue to try and push it on me, I WILL NOT CARE, my opinion stands as is. Get. Over. It. If you couldn't comprehend this Army proofed version I've provided you, then I really am arguing with a child and you will garner no further responses from me. Final OPINION (trying to stress the importance of that word), Halo 4 >ODST&Reach. Good day.
-
Edited by VerrucktSchakal: 1/11/2013 7:57:15 PMchild? LOL great assumption there bud. But wrong, more than likely I am older than you are. Halo 4 isn't that great. By the way, I love Single Player games far more than MM any day of the week. I simply state majority of people only play for MM, thus more reviews tend to focus more heavily on that than anything else. They go by trends. Current 'trend' is multiplayer. Even devs react to this by cutting main single player story down in quality. Good for you that you don't care, no need to temper tantrum over it. Just accept my views and comments about what I see reviews do, just as you expect me to accept your views. It goes both ways you know? Army proofed.. haha.. that's funny. Apparently Army Proofed, doesn't include paragraphing. Get the Marine Proofed upgrade. (This part by the way, was nothing more than a joke, but do learn paragraphing. it helps.)
-
That was a small paragraph, but I'll be sure to break it up next time so your feeble mind can adjust. I accepted your numbers as nothing more than proof that people enjoy the MP more in Reach than 4, read my last post. I'm saying that I couldn't care less and it doesn't alter my opinion. Also, unless you're in your thirties, I'm betting I'm older than you.
-
32. dec 9th 1980. Feeble mind no, but it isn't that great reading walls of text either. And Even I said myself, good for you that you don't care. You're as stubborn as I am, and this could go on and on tail chasing forever. No point to it really. So done and done, we made our points.
-
You have me beat by a couple of years then. Agree to disagree then? I mean, what's the point of a forum if people can't debate and discuss their opinions. I'm just happy I didn't swear, mounds of improvements compared to my forum activity on this site back in 2004.
-
Heh. Yea, I try not to swear when I type.. it doesn't always work, and even with the -Blam!- fliter gone, I don't feel the need to show my backside by swearing every other word because I can. I may swear here and there, but nothing like I used to either. Age and Maturity (Not always both) does that. :) But yes, agree to disagree indeed.
-
What about it is better than ODST?
-
It's just my opinion.
-
People usually have evidence to back up their opinion.
-
An opinion is personal preference. I enjoyed the campaign much better, and even though I haven't cared about Halo multiplayer since Halo 2, I enjoyed what Halo 4 had to offer. ODST was too short for me and it felt more like an expansion pack rather than a full game. I'm not saying that I didn't enjoy ODST, I just didn't like it as much as I like Halo 4.
-
There is no way you could have found Halo 4 to have a better campaign than ODST...
-
ODST sucked. Halo 4 was a much better campaign.