really eagle? resorting to this in your halo 4 hate? I guess history really does repeat itself.... over and over... [i]every three to five years[/i]
English
-
Refer to my top line. I'm glad you bothered to read. Asshole.
-
umad? and it's funny, I distinctly remember you flaming me for saying Reach was bungie's playground, where they were experimenting with new concepts and setting halo up for a decent game with Reach's new features for 343 to refine... but they did indeed fall flat on their faces with it and indeed messed up but I do agree, reach was wrongly hated, by you and quite a number of others who are now saying that it's a good game and halo 4 is satan, and in my almost 8 years on this forum you have repeated what countless others have done. thus my previous comment.
-
This didn't happen with Halo 3, so I don't know what you're getting at. There is no cycle. Halo Reach seemed bad compared to what Bungie had done before, and it is bad compared to that. It is still a good game though. Halo 4 looks like shit regardless. Halo 4 is shit.
-
No cycle? Halo 3 definitely got hated on, Needler not being dual weild, "Equipment sucks" , "no skill involved", and it was "A broken Mess" that's the ones I remember the most, but the ones who hated had their posts removed and they were banned... ring any bells? and another thing, they all said halo 2 was better Halo 2 was hated on, hell it even got a site dedicated to all the hate, bungie apologised for it, they all said that dual weilding broke the game, and there was too much lag.. but all of them said CE was better the spin offs all got flak for various reasons, the only game that was universally loved was Halo CE. There is a cycle of loving the previous game and ripping the new one to sheds. you're the same as the ones who hated on halo 3, and the ones who hated on halo 2, the only difference is what game you're bitching about.