I agree to a point. But I think the hope is that the 3s play list will be more populated. When it's more populated you should not meet stacks all the time making 7 wins doable. Might take some time, but doable. Given that there is an increase in rewards in 3s then it does seem like a positive move
English
-
Edited by Raydra92: 7/26/2024 11:51:46 AMThats a great big IF, it would only work that way if statistically an even amount of bad trios played compared to good trios, balancing out the lobbies, well, even worse actually Most trios are really good, either doing carries or just super in tune. For there to be balance we’d need around 200% more trios, one half of that being mediocre and the other 100% being absolute bad trios. Those bad trios would then have to keep losing all weekend, even after their card of persistence is done, in order to maintain balance Right now with sometimes only 1000 trios playing the chances of matching vs high skill players is extremely high Edit : Its not an increase to rewards, they just don’t get a loss deducted but I think getting a win will be so much harder that playing in a trio as a bad player (which is what card of persistence is for, good players aim for the lighthouse) will take at least twice or three times the amount of games to complete compared to solo queue So no, def not worth it at all