{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/14/2023 10:21:27 AM
7
Problem is they gave gambit attention and made changes to it unfortunately these changes made the haters hate it even more example the increased health regain from invasion kills unfortunately some people who like gambit are the toxic invaders that will constantly invade even when their team has a prinevil and ghe other team dosnt of they got rid of invaders and gave boss something else to get health back that would probably encourage people to play that are not toxic
English
-
Invading isn't toxic. Invading disrupts the enemy team and heals the enemy primeval. I think seeing invaders as toxic for killing is part of what's hurting Gambit's reputation
-
I used one example of what i consider a toxic invader not every invader is toxic
-
Yeah but those invasions aren't toxic either. They still serve to disrupt the enemy team. The whole point of Gambit is that people do whatever they can to win
-
So invading when its not needed and your team already had a masive advantage isnt toxic?
-
No it isn't. It prevents the enemy team from recovering and still serves a purpose
-
Then your idea of toxic and mine are very different
-
Well yeah
