Huh... [quote]In this simulation of 500 attempts to get to Legend, at your winrate of 60% you succeeded 100.0% of the attempts. (You have a good chance of getting there if you succeeded more than 65% of the simulations.) If you made it, you did it in 190 games on average and would have spent 72 minutes per day if you played to the end of the season. If you played for 4 hours per day you would finish in 11 days.[/quote] This thing makes it seem possible, doesn't it? Still would need a good team though...
Edited by Wagooigi: 8/13/2019 4:15:45 PMIt assumes your win % will be consistent even when reaching higher glory levels. If your win % DOES remain consistent then yes it’ll be accurate. That is rather unlikely though, unless a good amount of the games you’ve played were at a high glory rating. It’s very much a misleading tool in terms of reaching Legend. It’s probably closer to accurate for Fabled but still not totally.
Yes - win rate assumption is the largest driver in the model. I should probably note that most should assume a lower rate than their current rate to account for better teams at Mythic Comp. But if you estimate your win rate relatively closely - it works quite well to give you an idea. It’s also why it shows a range of Winrates by default. Even a 2 or three point difference in winrate can change people’s chances...