{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/15/2019 4:11:33 AM
5
To all saying riskrunner replaces zhalo, theres a massive difference between the two:
Riskrunner special perks:
[b]Arc Conductor[/b]
When taking Arc Damage, this weapon becomes more powerful and resists incoming Arc Damage. Kills extend the time in this overcharged state
[b]Superconductor[/b]
When Arc Conductor is active, shots fired have the chance to become chain lightning and return ammo.
Zhalo special perks:
[b]Zhalo Supercell[/b]
Arc projectiles have the chance to chain lightning when enemies are close together.
[b]Bolts from the Blue[/b]
Double kills with this weapon charge a small amount of Super energy and return ammo to the magazine.
Sure, some of the perks are similar but we have a -blam!-ING BOW that chains lightning too y'know and no one complains there.
English
-
Zhallo is only slightly better in my book because you don't have to take arc damage in order to chain lightning honestly if they just have risk runner chain lightning without taking damage and then have it go into overdrive when you take arc damage I'd be fine without zhallo.
-
The Zhalo still seems like the better weapon. Maybe its the memories of running through the Omnigul strike with it. Riskrunner is still a very effective weapon. Especially with the catalyst.
-
zhalo will always be top tier
-
Because who uses or even remembers the arc bow? Risk Runner is the zhalo of D2, like crimson and red death
-
I mean as weapons they couldnt be more different. Risk runner is a small caliper SMG and Zhalo was basically an AK-74. The other 2 are two completely different weapons. A hand cannon and a rifle. I for one would love to have an Ak-47/74 AKS, AKM. Something beastly & legend.
