You really are deliberately dense. I am well aware of the gambler's fallacy, as well as how each roll of the dice is a stochastic instance. The whole point of the use of a cumulative probability system such as that used in 3oC is that when you reach your tenth roll your odds of a favorable outcome have become 100%. Are you really so dumb that you think the gambler's fallacy applies when the odds of winning are 100%? You dare condescend to people about a disinterest in logic and a bubble of misinformation when you're too stupid to understand the topic, the point, and the entire discussion? No one said the odds are naturally cumulative. We understand each spin of the RNG is a stochastic instance uninfluenced by previous spins and having no effect on future spins. The point is to apply a system that ARTIFICIALLY compounds the odds with each spin so that the desired outcome is eventually guaranteed, as it was with ToC at their best, which is why they were brought up in the discussion. You are thick as a brick.
Your role as a moderator enables you immediately ban this user from messaging (bypassing the report queue) if you select a punishment.
7 Day Ban
7 Day Ban
30 Day Ban
Permanent Ban
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
close
Our policies have recently changed. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
Our policies have recently changed. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.