{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/17/2018 9:44:59 PM
9
Good thing they didn't have guns, many more would have been killed
English
-
You don’t know that, though.
-
You are currently saying that it is easier to kill someone with a knife then a gun. This is completely false. In debate we have a thing called the common sense clause. Essentially it’s a practice that says something things are common sense and we don’t need to argue about it. You are currently violating that clause. If you’d like I can argue with you about this topic but it’s a waste of time and energy and distracts from what we should really be focusing on
-
@Darth Turtle If guns were legal and more people carried them there would be a very high chance that it would have been stopped before 20-30 casualties.
-
The group of people would have been able to Kill more People’s faster. They had the element of surprise. Even if people there had guns it would turn into a fire fight between the gunman and the citizens.
-
If you’re equating the deadliness of knives to that of guns, go ahead and come back to earth. Cause you’re straight tripping space balls dude.
-
10/10 would ad hominem again
-
Call it a hunch lol.
-
Seriously.
-
Lol 'well I guess we'll never really [i]know[/i] if using spoons would've gotten them less kills' XDXD
