So, Nxris, sell this user/others on the idea of "AnComs" and "LibSocs". Try not to assume but this user gets the feeling Krakpotkin will be mentioned. Thoughts on Sargn and V's stream bashing AnCom not working on one of iz channels? How are dey not paradoxical? Argument against AnCap/right Libertarian Minarchists? Compare contrast to Spoonr, Warrn, Hopp, Rothbrd, Molynu, Mizez, Blok, Gwin, Stirmr? Come on peepz, lez get a REASONABLE DISCUSHON going.
English
-
Well if it's voluntary and doesn't violate the NAP then theoretically it can be achieved under AnCapistan and anarcho-capitalism would allow for libertarian-socialism (talking Str Trkkian Federation not falling to become the Bohrg collective here) and this user feels it's a bit redundant so this user glossed over it as this user thought it was covered but cool whatever, go for it. AnCom still shaky on, it literally violates the NAP by principle it seems if not just a worse name but the same thing as LibSoc...care to try to cover the differences, if any, between LibSoc and AnComrade? Soc being the HIV to the AIDS of Com, as it were (not necessarily making a knock that time just pulled that off the top of the head, it's late) only on "steroids", sell someone on being an AnCom compared to being just a LibSoc as well as than definitely from being AnCap. Difference between AnCom and regular/tried and failed Com without the "An"? The lack of a state form of government? This user can see LibSoc being that but doesn't Com rely on the idea of a state to carry out its functions? Please, go on if one has the time, others join in. Back to strikes in the meantime.
-
Libertarian Socialism is an anti-authoritarian branch of Socialism, it is supportive a worker-oriented and community driven system of production, in the pursuit of maximizing individual liberties. It an Anarcho-Communism are only an oxymoron if you think of these definitions of linear. They aren't.