Also scientists are not sure about global warming. It needs to stop being taught as a fact with definitive outcomes and solutions because every single year predictions change fairly dramatically and not all aspects of the planets climate system are understood. A simple example is if you take the IPCC's most recent report it will differ from most other reports aimed at predicting the same thing. Actually given their predicted economic impact (like thats even a real estimate) it would be better for everyone economically to not waste money on subpar climate change policy and technology but just go about our business as normal.
The 'science' is built upon many wild guesses and arbitrary predictions and they have no supporting data for drastic mitigation policy.
Yes you should limit pollution and do your best not to harm the environment in every way possible from dams, to improper waste disposal, to oil spills but all this pseudoscience about CO2 being the devil detracts from other issues and makes something that may or may not be an issue into the single focus.
English
-
How much of a factor is CO2 in accelerating warming then? Just asking for when I can look at studies when I get home.
-
Not sure what you mean. If you're referring to the long term effects of human CO2 emissions then it depends who you ask