I'm going to be completely honest here: I've been getting [i]really[/i] salty after playing Elimination matches full of these guns. I know it's irrational, but I can't help it. Playing against fireteams of hardscopers and ROFLstompers is incredibly annoying; especially when they're using the most broken guns in 3v3 and acting like they're hot shit or something. I feel like a majority of the defenders of these weapons make their arguments from a standpoint of "I use these things, therefore they're balanced," or "I have fun using these guns, so if you aren't having fun playing against me, you're a whining shit-talker." It's my [b]opinion[/b] that The Palindrome, Eyasluna, and Ice Breaker are among the a-little-too-strong things in Destiny, and I don't think they should be able to do the things they do. All I'm asking for are reasonable explanations for why I'm wrong. I want some sort of explanation for why 3-shot handcannons and a sniper with infinite ammo are perfectly balanced and not superior to almost everything else in the game (barring sidearms). Thanks for your time. [spoiler]Just so you don't have to waste your time, my K/Ds across my three characters are 1.3, 1.2, and 1.0. My Titan has a lower ratio because I never play on it. I play on my Warlock the most. Also, yes, I use a sidearm. The Wormwood, to be specific. The only reason I use this weapon is because of the special ammo changes. I was a big fan of sniping and fusion rifling before the changes. I'm very aware that these weapons are very strong right now, but I believe that that is solely due to the ammo changes. The guns themselves aren't incredibly overpowered or anything.[/spoiler] [spoiler]Also, for the sake of avoiding drama, I'll be ignoring all sarcastic/insulting responses. "Git gud" or "Cry more" are comments that don't warrant discussion.[/spoiler]