That's a lot more different secondaries than.....
Matador
Let's see
Matador
Oh and
Matador....
English
-
Different? Perhaps. Better? Not really.
-
Any time you have a weapon resulting in more than 50% of all kills, something isn't right...
-
Yep. Underpowered primaries and 3/4s of the games maps promoting CQC.
-
Well, this should take care of that should it not??
-
Nope. The sidearm meta is already taking shape, as well as the cries to Nerf them....
-
I called it the day of the patch dropping !!! I said it's a matter of hours b4 people start complaining "sidearms too strong"
-
Even if it was just sidearms... at least it is sidearms with an S, and not Matador.. But you first said the meta was ... "sidearm/Ice Breaker/Invective meta" Now it's just sidearms? Pretty sure I am playing crucible right now and there is more variation than there has ever been.... Seems to me, people don't know the definition of "primary" and "special"
-
I have to agree with kelly here. I was playing 6v6s and at least 8-10 players on had a side arm by the end of the game
-
Smh. I think some of you need to pay less attention to the kill feed, and more attention to the play styles you're being confronted with.
-
It comes down to kills. Just because someone equips a no land does not mean they are good or can kill with it. We have moved to a slightly longer ranged game... wtf is wrong with that...
-
What? We've covered up that cancer with a band-aid! You can't see it any more. Why are you still complaining....