What I think is weird is that the only canon Sith from the EU are Bane, Revan, Vader, and Sidious.
Vader and Sidious, obviously.
Bane for the Rule of Two.
But Revan? Seems oddly specific.
Is it because of KOTOR?
And if he's canon, then doesn't every Sith/Jedi involved in Revans life also have to be canon?
Disney is just being strange in their canon.
English
-
Plagues is canon
-
Oh him too
-
And dooku Also maul and ventress
-
Ventress is a dark Jedi more than a Sith. And Dooku? Same, kinda. But admittedly I didn't watch much of TCW so maybe he develops into a Sith later on.
-
Dooku gains the title of darth And ventress I guess your right. The website also says savage oppress is a sith but I don't exactly think so since the night sisters basically formed him up
-
Pretty sure he was a fake cause he and maul claimed the title of Sith Lord unrightfully so Sidious killed them.
-
Yes but dooku was studious apprentice
-
I'm talking about Savaj Oppress or whatever
-
Oh yea he isn't sith
-
Revan isn't canon. Not yet.
-
I've heard he is.
-
Almost everything from The Old Republic isn't canon. The current MMO is no longer canon but Disney still wants a chunk of it's profits.
-
[quote]Almost everything from The Old Republic isn't canon. The current MMO is no longer canon but Disney still wants a chunk of it's profits.[/quote] Revan is mentioned in passing in the new star wars encyclopedia. Not by name, just a reference in the kylo ren section. Until mentioned by name directly assume him to not be canon.