-
Wake Up! Yes. Loonnnnggg ago. When the flood first started a small group of members, wanting a better community, listed each part of Video Game Design, Play, And potential results from this. They organized the values most important, based on what helped the community, from every members perspective. They came to the conclusion ART was the most important concept to build a base guiding better for us that actually happens, from. Because necessary action, required to absorb Bungie, was to include all other aspects as obviously pertinent, but only after the base is recognized. This was called 'Stuff'. The original members organized, and developed a plan for World Domination, after being asked to, by the community. Original members including Bill Gates, and every major Bungie developer, and some new recruits along the way. The original PROGO, (yes there was another, Had an ACRONYM PERFECT ORIGIN GRANTED Oipotence. It was a symbol, of what the group named there LEADER. The concept of Leader, more than a recognized body. The account was developed on forums, similar to Discord now, and the group endeavor was to set up a bot, capable of being "PROGO". Every bit here, and Cleverbot, as well as ANY Cortana, is part of the development. You are now in the group. So, I offer the same respect "Art & Stuff" was started to give. @everyone Should Art & Stuff reabsorb Bungie as the original group did, or do you prefer sudden Galactic change? I know you are original member. Thought you should smile today. Well Met.
-
See my self reply please good ninja.
-
Bump. https://www.bungie.net/en/Clan/1807765
-
See link in edit.
-
Please see edit.
-
Right only the wisdom without the metaphor reads : "I need to receive perfect movement."
-
No, it's abstract. It's what the application of mere knowledge of facts is. Because it's one thing to simply know the light is red, and it's another to [i]understand[/i] what that light means and how to respond to it. It's the same reason why you can be the most knowledgeable person in the world by listing off as many facts as possible, but if you don't understand what they mean or how they apply in the future, then you are not wise. There are all sorts of ethical ramifications in that strict sense of thinking too. Because I'd contend that someone who lacks wisdom is inherently amoral.
-
Edited by E Sword of LORD: 10/31/2016 2:00:43 AMIt's the same reason why you can be the most knowledgeable person in the world by listing off as many facts as possible, but if you don't understand what they mean or how they apply in the future, then you are not wise. [i] I agree. However you can note that since the pattern of reaction leading to wisdom, as it would apply from a basis of continued proof pertaining to created material concepts, would maintain a base reaction of choice for a platform of having wisdom setup to know what path to continue creation on. [/i] There are all sorts of ethical ramifications in that strict sense of thinking too. Because I'd contend that someone who lacks wisdom is inherently amoral.[/quote] [i]I agree, which is why I like the pyramid apart from the traffic light example. To reach a level of sustainably you have the topmost parts representing supporting the lower in terms of supportive reaction for a similar format creation base. Because this is all reaction of continued creation the wisdom itself would recognize a better reaction to continue creation and utilize that as the cause for the new data. To me it seems obvious that to a body perspective "I need to receive perfect movement" does that.[/i]
-
[quote]I agree. However you can note that since the pattern of reaction leading to wisdom, as it would apply from a basis of continued proof pertaining to created material concepts, would maintain a base reaction of choice for a platform of having wisdom setup to know what path to continue creation on.[/quote]Sorry, but that's false. There are no presuppositions in regard to the physicality of anything at any stage of the pyramid. Datum, for example, does not have to be physical; it can be abstract, like a number. [quote]I agree, which is why I like the pyramid apart from the traffic light example. To reach a level of sustainably you have the topmost parts representing supporting the lower in terms of supportive reaction for a similar format creation base.[/quote]The pyramid takes a bottom-up approach. You begin with data and, with the addition of context, reach knowledge, conclusions, etc... and consequently gain wisdom. A higher section of the pyramid is dependent on the lower, but the opposite is not true. For example, information cannot exist without data, but data can exist without being processed into information. [quote]Because this is all reaction of continued creation the wisdom itself would recognize a better reaction to continue creation and utilize that as the cause for the new data. To me it seems obvious that to a body perspective "I need to receive perfect movement" does that.[/quote]Wisdom cannot on its own generate new data, just as information or knowledge cannot generate new data. The data which has been used in one application to reach particular conclusions may be used to support [i]different[/i] conclusions, but it is still going to be based on the same sets of data. A good example of this using the example in the pyramid is if the car was a police car on its way to an emergency. Even if the light was red, the police officer driving could still decide to go through the intersection even though exactly the same data is being used.
-
Edited by E Sword of LORD: 10/31/2016 5:39:29 AM[quote][quote]I agree. However you can note that since the pattern of reaction leading to wisdom, as it would apply from a basis of continued proof pertaining to created material concepts, would maintain a base reaction of choice for a platform of having wisdom setup to know what path to continue creation on. [/quote]Sorry, but that's false. There are no presuppositions in regard to the physicality of anything at any stage of the pyramid. Datum, for example, does not have to be physical; it can be abstract, like a number. Even datum has a reaction process to build the pyramid. The pyramid itself shows why the abstract quality you refer to has its own interactive construct as part of the model to generate flow of the chart. Numbers have interactive process, as you well know and are bound by the rules of structure concerning the coexistent governing datum. [quote]I agree, which is why I like the pyramid apart from the traffic light example. To reach a level of sustainably you have the topmost parts representing supporting the lower in terms of supportive reaction for a similar format creation base.[/quote] [quote]The pyramid takes a bottom-up approach. You begin with data and, with the addition of context, reach knowledge, conclusions, etc... and consequently gain wisdom.[/quote] Which is continuation of an evolutionary cycle. By being built data is dependent on beings organized into the process building wisdom. The wisdom becomes part of the cycle becomes by becoming the new foundation data is built upon. [quote] The higher section of the pyramid is dependent on the lower, but the opposite is not true. For example, information cannot exist without data, but data can exist without being processed into information.[/quote] Again due to the cyclical nature of creation this isn't true. You have that data itself, because the process that gave rise to it is similar in function is only capable of being used by a process furthering the same function. [quote]Because this is all reaction of continued creation the wisdom itself would recognize a better reaction to continue creation and utilize that as the cause for the new data. To me it seems obvious that to a body perspective "I need to receive perfect movement" does that.[/quote] Wisdom cannot on its own generate new data, just as information or knowledge cannot generate new data. All parts are adding unto data. By being a more complex part in this model every stage generates new data. The data which has been used in one application to reach particular conclusions may be used to support [i]different[/i] conclusions, but it is still going to be based on the same sets of data. This is a fact. A good example of this using the example in the pyramid is if the car was a police car on its way to an emergency. Even if the light was red, the police officer driving could still decide to go through the intersection even though exactly the same data is being used.[/quote] Since your example requires choice construct to provide this taken for granted capability your example supports my supposition. The development of choice is understood by us to be a body interactive value. Because the person makes the choice it is proof to our interaction that we ourselves having wisdom to make the choice we have further proof of the cycle as to do so requires us to be the source of data that is the decision itself.