{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by shiloh:
10/24/2016 9:06:50 PM
12
Does anyone else agree that...
Black Ops 3 should be MA and Battlefield 1 should be R? I personally reckon that Battlefield 1 is actual a very violent game and Black Ops 3 isn't worthy of the R 18+ sticker. Anyone else agree?
Edit: I live in Australia so the game ratings here are: G, PG, M, MA 15+ and R 18+
English
#Gaming
-
Don't know, haven't played it. Only seen beta footage. Those bayonet rushes are pretty brutal though.
-
2 RepliesWait are we talking about games or movies? Pretty sure it's T, M
-
Who cares?
-
It's only R because you watch your limbs get violently torn off.
-
CoD should be rated T at this point. The majority of those who play it are under 17.
-
1 ReplyEdited by Lt Dan: 10/24/2016 12:35:37 PMBlack ops is just as violent, you just can't see past all the Michael bay explosions
-
R? That's a movie rating. Not a video game rating
-
Why are you rating them like movies?
-
With the f-bombs and getting gibbed, i can see why Bo3 is rated M
-
Both M in America.
-
If you look at the rating, BF1 only has blood, language, and intense violence. Bo3 has Blood and Gore, Language, suggestive themes, intense violence, etc. So basically no
-
They shouldn't have ratings because they're just a game.
