JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

10/22/2016 11:10:55 PM
5
While I agree we need better energy, that shit costs a lot of money. From middle class citizens who just barely make 6 figures a year because God forbid your boys, Soros and Bilderburg fund it. Until I see them pay for something for once in their old decrepit lives, none of us should have to either.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [u][b]tax funding[/b][/u]

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote][u][b]tax funding[/b][/u][/quote] Yeah I know. Why isn't Soros and Bilderburg paying their fair share? Until you can answer that, you can't justify taxing the middle class for this.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Cant happen if a presidential canidate does not right? Dont see where i said to tax the middle class. The nominees are not too keen on taxing the middle class more even though i have an idea to why you would protest that.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote]Cant happen if a presidential canidate does not right? Dont see where i said to tax the middle class. The nominees are not too keen on taxing the middle class more even though i have an idea to why you would protest that.[/quote] Except he said himself he's just taking advantage of what's available to him by Hillary. You never said middle class. I did. I was explaining that hillary believes the middle class [i]is[/i] the rich. Some dude who barely makes 6 figures a year. Here's a quote from Stall about this, [quote]"Ah, but through the magic power of class resentment, we can finance our deficit-spending by taxing the rich!" It isn't as if the top 25% of Americans pay 86% of all income taxes collected. It isn't as if the top 10% pay 70%. And it isn't as if the top 5% pay 58%. And the top 1% certainly don't pay 37%, which is over a third. Oh, wait... They all do. (http://taxfoundation.org/article/summary-latest-federal-income-tax-data-2015-update) 97% of the income tax burden falls on 50% of the country. However, let's not let that get in the way of increasing the size and scope of the state. The problem certainly isn't that we spend too much. That's ludicrous. What an extremist position. We just don't take enough of [i]your[/i] money.[/quote]

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Its taking out of excess rather than poverty. A balance. The people are the REAL spenders. Not businesses. The people spend their money. Many if the top GLOBAL conglomerates soak the money, and taxes come in to make sure that their nets are moderated so that way 70-90% of all wealth does not go to a few individuals. Ask past oligarchs that refused to moderate their coffers and got chopped instead. Appease the people. Step on them too long and you create imbalance. Gov relgulates that balance. One issue of today is how people use loopholes and have been upsetring the balance 30 years now. Some economists believe this to be another gilded age. Nice name but terrible structure and will lead us to ruin if you do nothing long enough.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon