Fools... grinding for a weapon that is subpar in all ways to Fatebringer...
English
-
At the moment, Fatebringer is 165 light below Imago Loop at best, and it's a pve gun. [spoiler]Your move[/spoiler]
-
Forget the light level.
-
It's the only relevant thing when talking about a pve gun bud. Other than that, with the right roll, it's Fatebringer without arc. Fatebringer has the advantage of having arc damage and a nicer color Imago loop has the advantage of actually being usable in the game currently Other than that, they are literally the exact same weapon
-
You explained exactly why Fatebringer is better. The Fatebringer was perfectlly designed, both in shape and perks alike. Perfection should not be put aside and made forgoten, elemental burns should return to primary weapons. Hand cannons are not fun to use anymore, at least, not to me.
-
Edited by DaGroove: 8/27/2016 9:43:04 AMYeah that's not what we talked about at all. You said imago loop was inferior in all ways, and in the state of the game it's quite the opposite Go back a year and put imago loop in the mix and you would have been right. Not any more tho bro.
-
That was why i said to forget the light level. It woul be like if i was asking who is better: Carl Lewis or Bolt. They were great (Bolt still is) in each time, but the question remains. One is obsolete, the other one is a younger version but will also fade away.
-
All ways may be a bit hyperbolic. The lack of Arc damage is really the only thing subpar about it, people have gotten the same roll.
-
I don`t have the same feeling playing with these weapons. Fatebringer was all about fun, Imago not that much.