{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/3/2016 9:00:58 PM
1
Mmm, that's a lot of text. You seem to be intent on questioning my legitimacy to comment based on experience (not valid), a stated bias (unfounded as I have not stated a preference to play any class) and a defence against these characteristics that is true of every ability, super or weapon in the game.
I did not think the nerf to Twilight Garrison was any more justified than Shadestep, for example.
What I do think is that Bungie knows their demographic. Younger, less worldly players always play the powerful hero character and that is what is being preserved. It's cynical and devalues the legitimacy of any claims of competitive or skilful gameplay.
English
-
And yet you expect me to believe what you're say about your other profile or experience in game. Ok, that makes perfect sense. Also I have pretty good reasoning for assuming your biased because, once again, you have an unleveled titan and have offered no proof about your real profile and you just refuse to believe that warlock and hunter have powerful abilities as well. For the example, landfall is a mini FoH combined with the best roaming super in the game. Do I want it nerfed? No. Is it a powerful ability? Yes. Based on everything that you have posted so far, it seems that you say you have qualifications and actually know how all the character play and feel and yet have offered no proof of this. You are biased against titans as your first post was complaining how op strikers are, even though they haven't changed at all since the launch of destiny, and how you want them nerfed. You stated how op their abilities are and over exaggerated how powerful they really are. Also you have had no reasonable, logical, or sound arguments to retort with to my points about striker. Based on those facts and a lot of their posts on the forums from hunter and warlock mains, you appear to be a biased and mad hunter/warlock main, who wants the titan nerfed because your favorite class/subclass got nerfed, and you aren't offering any sort of logical reasoning in a counter argument so that isn't helping your case. Also you have refused to back up what you are saying about being qualified with any form of proof. So I have stated how striker titans aren't op in a counter argument against you and haven't had any form of one back and while I have backed up what I said with proof, you haven't, and just hid behind false logic and big words.
-
I don't expect you to believe anything, nor does it matter to me what you might choose to believe or not. There is no onus on me to prove anything, I am merely stating what I believe to be incontrovertible. Your advice on how to counter Striker is unnecessary and serves no purpose for me. I am quite familiar with it and all 8 of the other subclasses in the game. You haven't presented anything legitimate here that counters my original reply to the OP, neither did I ask you to. That impetus is yours alone.
-
If you don't need any advice then why is your k/d terrible? And why are you so biased against striker titans, which you obviously don't play?
-
You have no idea what my KD, win/loss, Elo is. How does that legitimate anything posited here?
-
He obviously didn't read the rules to my post...
-
Actually I do. All I have to do is click on your profile name and it'll pull up all of your characters, their stats, and their levels. Like your negative k/d on all of your characters and your unleveled titan.
-
Like I said previously, these aren't my characters. The Hunter is mainly my wife, the Warlock is my ten-year old daughter and the Titan, probably a mixture of my 10 year old and 7 year old.
-
Ha! I knew you would say that. So predictable. And yet you haven't backed anything you've said up, with proof. You have done nothing but hide behind your own bias, poor reasoning and lack of logic, and big words. While I've offered a reasonable counter argument, of which you ignored and used your false statements, and backed up what I've said with proof. I do believe that is W for me, and an L for you. Better luck next time.
-
Win for you and loss for me? That statement backs up all the content of the previous posts. Puerile and juvenile. All the best.
-
There you go again, trying to hide behind fake reasoning and your big words.
-
...and my opinion is not biased. I think I addressed these things previously.
-
I mean, opinions are always biased, but I still believe you are the right here. The other guy doesn't quite understand things, does he? I knew you would say that! Yes, you did, as I quite literally already said that. You are calling a games score after it has been posted, and calling it a prediction.
