JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
4/23/2016 2:35:29 AM
29

Your thoughts on Social Security?

Social Security is fine as it is.

65

Raise the retirement age.

17

Phase it out with private plans.

113

Increase Social Security Tax.

7

Results/Other

96

What is your opinion of Social Security? For those who don't know about it, let me give you a crash course. I'll try and be objective. Social Security was developed by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The idea was that it would provide for people in their old age. It was (supposedly) supposed to be self-sustaining. People pay into the system, get old, and get money out of the system. People pay in by paying a Social Security Tax. This tax is not applied to an individual account. It is a giant conglomerate of tax revenue. At retirement age (officially 65), people can collect their Social Security checks. Now, objectivity aside, let me give you the problems facing Social Security. 1) Currently, Social Security and other such entitlements account for 40% of current expenditures. It's unsustainable spending. 2) People are getting more out than they put in. Thanks to medical innovation (which is thanks to capitalism, might I add), elderly people are living longer than they used to. This means more checks. 3) Fewer people are paying in. Declining birth rates mean we have a proportionally smaller amount of people finding Social Security. Libertarians have a few strong opinions on Social Security. My [i]personal[/i] thought is that FDR truly believed that SS would be sustainable. He was mistaken, clearly. However, I think he also had some ulterior motives while implementing it. Let me explain. Anybody can see that Social Security is just state-ownership of retirement plans. An intelligent and inquisitive mind should wonder, "Why even implement it? It's just a massive savings account owned by the state. Can't individuals just save on their own?" Here's the catch, and I suspect that FDR planned this: If I'm 50 years old, I've presumably put in approximately 30 years worth of SS taxes into SS. Now, if SS didn't exist, I'd have had all of that money in my 30 years of paychecks, instead. That money would go into a savings account, or it would be invested, or it would be converted into material wealth. In other words, I would own it, not the state. Imagine that I die. Does my family ever see any of that money? No. It becomes pure state revenue. That's my suspicion of SS. It's a cheap way of generating a bit of cash for the state. It's definitely backfired, however. What are [i]your[/i] thoughts on Social Security?

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • Edited by SuperStormDroid: 4/23/2016 7:54:17 PM
    Unless only non profit organizations can replace social security, I'm not sure how privatizing social security would work. Can someone enlighten me on how this would work? Privatising something sounds drastic (almost all actions have consequences, you know) and I believe that some things should never be fully privatized (education for example, although private schools can co-exist with public schools).

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    13 Replies
    You are not allowed to view this content.
    ;
    preload icon
    preload icon
    preload icon