ok, well thats good then. It pisses me off when [i]any[/i] group claims theyre hated on. Its petty when gays say their rights were taken away because a private piece of property refused service for personal reasons.
English
-
Well, if we as a society has already concluded that if a store provides a service that is one. to public and then refuses service based solely on skin color that it is a violation of civil rights I don't see why that wouldn't apply to homosexuals. McDonald's cannot deny all black people and the same applies to all companies private or not.
-
for stores and other businesses dealing with goods there is no reason they [i]would[/i] deny business with them, however the marriage field and anything related to sexuality is pretty much fair game. My reasoning is that marriage as a whole subject is very touchy and should be left alone to prevent conflict among beliefs. But economically, a business would not normally go out of its way to deny services/ exchanges solely based off any personal feature/belief. It costs money while also losing potential business opportunity.