Yet this is a later study showing that there is no "net losses" and that shedding is hardly relevant. In order to even begin to gain net losses in a worst case scenario it wouldn't happen until 2046.
Look at the bottom genius.
Also it doesn't even seem like you read your own article beyond the headline. It says that Antarctic ice growing, even at a surplus, doesn't negate the Arctic ice disappearing. Global climate doesn't work like that.
You are correlating an increase in ice with global warming being false. Which is a false assumption and the article you are referencing even says the two are unrelated. You proved yourself wrong, so instead of admitting you look like a moron you are nitpicking details.
Your role as a moderator enables you immediately ban this user from messaging (bypassing the report queue) if you select a punishment.
7 Day Ban
7 Day Ban
30 Day Ban
Permanent Ban
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
close
Our policies have recently changed. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
Our policies have recently changed. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.