I want your honest opinions. Do you believe everything this man says? He pulls up graphs, articles, study's, and personal stories. If you are offended by this post, please tell me. You deserve your right to talk to me. Please do not attack anyone but me. Other people, please don't attack each other. I want an intelligent conversation with adults. If you aren't one, please try to be when speaking on this thread.
Here is another video that even talks about women suffering from feminist movements: http://youtu.be/_z5RLc6YXpw
-
[i]While supplies last[/i] [i]Call now and get a free cherry popsicle with every purchase over $20[/i]
-
I agree with his sentiments. Not everything he says is true though. Feminazis don't want beta males though so whenever I see a beta trying to suck up to them I feel sorry for the guy. I'll share a personal story about how radical feminism can be defeated though to entertain the fine people of this thread. At my highschool sophmore year we had a outbreak of radical feminism and we freaked out and almost gave up, until me and a few other smart dudes came up with a plan to stop them from spreading. We got 90% of the males to start dieting and working out hard. All of us worked hard to better ourselves, even the wimpy dudes got shredded after 7 or 8 months and confidence was sky high among us. But we had a ban on dating ANY of the feminist girls. We ignored them and anyone associated with them. Starve them of attention and love, we drew our line in the sand. We spread word to the other schools of the rules we did and 4 other high schools followed our example. The feminists got really depressed from getting rejected and shunned but nobody caved for them. Us or them. Come prom time we all had a great time. Nobody went stag among us, all of us had decent dates. Most of the radical feminists stayed home rather than go to prom. We rekt them. We made a stand and refused to interact with them and they were the ones who suffered not us. A lot of people might consider me an ass but I'd disagree. Our cause helped a lot of people boost their self worth through hard work and determination. Many of these dudes would have stayed beta if we didn't teach them to take care of themselves and be assertive. Anyway that is my personal experience sir. I hope the thread favors it.
-
[b] [/b]
-
I love this guy.
-
Edited by Marear: 8/14/2015 2:26:04 AMtl;dr - Radical Feminism turns you into an ugly swamp donkey [spoiler]brilliant[/spoiler]
-
New video up. I wonder...Nah.
-
This just got a lot worse. http://www.nationalpost.com/m/wp/blog.html?b=news.nationalpost.com//full-comment/christie-blatchford-ruling-in-twitter-harassment-trial-could-have-enormous-fallout-for-free-speech
-
Edited by savage coco: 8/13/2015 8:01:44 PMLol I laughed so hard at this, good video. I do agree with the male portion, it's clear no guy actually agrees with radical feminist, they just want to look good & hope to get some action. Definitely gave me a new perspective on it & made good points.
-
kidnap her and she'll scream -blam!- send help and she'll scream patriarchy
-
NO! NOT THE VIDEO GAMES! ANYTHING BUT THAT!
-
10/10.
-
This video just confirmed everything I've ever thought about feminist ever.
-
I've honestly never seen modern day feminism summed up so well.
-
Swamp Donkeys ...Classic!
-
Comment so I can watch later please
-
The guy's a douche, but calling white knights "metrosexual nancy boy hipsters" -blam!-in got me in tears
-
Awesome
-
LMFAO IT'S SO TRUE!
-
Remember people the "feminism" of today is not true feminism it is classified as third wave feminism and has the most extreme groups within it. First and second wave feminism were actually beneficial and fought for true equality rather than domination. Just remember the difference when discussing it. Most third wave feminists are basically insane and never experienced any real sexism that existed in the past. Most are fairly young as well in comparison to those in the first and second wave movements.
-
Lawl Seems legit. I enjoyed it.
-
The guy just drew a line between looks and beliefs. Because they are so closely linked. And then said men were pretending to agree to look like white knights for the women he basically just said no man would want and would categorically hate them because they are misogynistic. The guy is a proper douche pulling facts from both studies and seemingly the air around him to make gigantic temporal correlations whilst simultaneously contradicting himself. This guy gives anti feminists a bad name and is seemingly dripping with the hatred and radicalism he is "against".
-
Loved it
-
Honest opinion, while I find everything this guy says correct, his manner was a bit, rude. But given how I have been treated in the past, physically abused by adult feminists when I was 14, I just agree with it all.
-
Totally. There is a difference between caring about women as you should care about everyone and a true feminist. I find this to be true. I watch lots of debates about many problems and I've watched a few including extreme (radical in my opinion) feminists. They all seem to match his description. He used the language he did to draw in views but he is correct, even if you are offended. I'm sure it has to do with the unrealistic physical standards we put on women and men. Unappealing women attract scrutiny more than other groups. I don't think that "misogynistic men" are the issue. It's society and subliminal messaging. There are unreasonable people when it comes to any topic, including women's rights. Even though feminists would never admit it, they are who they are because they are fat and ugly. I don't think that this fact makes their opinions any less valid though. They have some truth sprinkled in with their propaganda. You can learn something good from everyone I guess.
-
Some information I encountered. [spoiler]-An article, found on Facebook: -Two people drunk. 1+1=3-1. Man blamed automatically. BOTH WERE DRUNK. System requires extensive rewrite.[/spoiler] My difficult-to-comprehend opinion. If you are offended, close spoilers immediately and go to[b] #Destiny[/b]. [spoiler]'Feminism' corrupted by [b]aggressive, sword-wielding zealots[/b] that really could do with being weaponized and thrown at Islamic State, because that is a serious issue. The person in the video has only a few things nailed: These 'Feminists' are metaphorically sword-wielding and barely know the words they use, as if reciting from an unseen bible of misused terminologies. [i]I seek to end these wars with words and digital duels rather than having to suffer being punched by one of them and being denied the option to defend myself.[/i] In short, what feminism did right back about 70 years ago: -Levelled things evenly. -Provided equality and balanced scales. -Numerous other, non-essential things. Now, what feminism is doing wrong: [i]-Targeting 1st and 1.5th world countries and domains with aggressive, hateful, misdirected violence and collateral damage. -Nearly causing many people's deaths by interfering with someone taking scenic images from a high-altitude drone. -Making themselves look like bloodthirsty club-wielding zealots of a faith equivalent to worshipping Diablo, the Lord of Terror.[/i] -I could go on making a few more points, but they cannot see. It's like the[b] Covenant's Great Journey all over again.[/b] If you don't Geth this: -Feminists of that caliber are zealous and out to murder every human who isn't like them with violent words and potential [UNKNOWN]. -There are those among them who think that term is the right thing, but we're even now, yes? Why focus on places where you've already won the battles? Or are you ill-educated in more departments than I can see? In the end, your lives are used up in fighting a war that will only make people, both men and women, laugh at your terrifying misconceptions and obsolete information.[/spoiler]
-
Edited by joibasta: 8/18/2015 2:27:38 AMA lot of what he said is very honest and he does give a lot of reasons and some statistics. I do wish he gets more notice around the world because what he is saying is very straight forward, rude but honest, and very very informing.