JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

#feedback

7/17/2015 6:40:38 AM
4

Question: Are you happy with the weapon buffs and nerfs?

Yes

42

No

45

BUT WHY NERF ICEBREAKER?

29

I'm not sure how I feel. Some buffs were needed, but still probably not enough, and some nerfs were just not needed. But I think we can all agree that IceBreaker did not need a nerf.

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • Auto rifles getting buffed. Good. Bout time. Hand cannons nerfed. Only a hanfull needed attention, but whatever. Scouts give a minor buff. No opinion really. Pulse rifles stability nerf. Wut? Why? Not sure why this was necessary. Shotguns nerfed. Good. Do it again. Fusion rifles ner... Did I read that right? Nerfed again? Why? Couldn't make this shit up. Final round neutered. I generally aim for the head anyway. Black Hammer. May as well have removed it from the game. Result would be the same. Icebreaker. If the intended playstyle was for this thing to reload on your back, they should have maxed its stability so the clip can be dumped fast. Gjallarhorn. Hmmm. Buffing the other heavies would have been preferable. TLW. Depends how much of a mag nerf this thing gets. Might end up being an experts only weapon. Could possibly have gotten away with fixing the ADS bug and increasing the damage drop off at range. Thorn. Poison should have been outright removed.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    1 Reply
    You are not allowed to view this content.
    ;
    preload icon
    preload icon
    preload icon