I feel that if someone can acknowledge that what they're doing is killing a living thing for selfish reasons, sure; let them kill a kid who can't even open his/her eyes and take the heat for it. Be sure to inform the "patient" on how the procedure will go down. That's not graphic, it's no different than getting a colonoscopy apparently. If that's true why not tell them what the doctor is going about killing this human?
There's always that part about sexual abuse. While I feel horrible for whomever the victim is I still honestly think they should follow through with the pregnancy. Not for religious reasons or scientific ones. I just can't imagine you getting that kid to agree to be put-down like a sick cat when they're old enough to understand what you mean. So why put them on trial like some slave who can't testify for themself?
If you aren't ready to raise a child or can't afford it, I'm all for adoption. It's a life spared and this boy/girl will be put in a safe home and grow up to be a freaking genius.
English
-
How many kids you adopted? Unless it's over 100 just stop it. You claim a better life but these kids just hopping from home to home always alone. They don't live happily or eat snackies listening to mom and daddy chattering. It's a rough life under a dirty roof with a million other dirty shoes squeaking around them. Speaking from experience, maybe no life is worth a terrible decision.
-
So you'd rather someone be dead instead of having to deal with harsh reality? That's insane.
-
No if someone was -blam!- they Definitely have the right to an abortion because they did not even cost to sex
-
Your sentence, no matter how many times I re-read it, made no sense.