Then create life in a lab, that's why I doesn't follow the scientific method or there would be an experiment that could create life 100% of the time from nothing
English
-
Edited by Britton: 7/5/2015 2:15:46 AMhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/7745868/Scientist-Craig-Venter-creates-life-for-first-time-in-laboratory-sparking-debate-about-playing-god.html http://www.wired.com/2009/05/ribonucleotides/
-
That has nothing to do with creating life in the same conditions as they say the planet was in when the first cell formed, you are trying to hard for any honest person to listen to such bullshit
-
Your logical fallacy: Ad hominem
-
So now you're adding additional criteria. Way to move the goal.
-
There is no additional criteria you are just flat out stupid for all life to evolve from a single cell as the theory of evolution states the first thing you must do to satisfy the scientific method is create life in the same condition as the planet would be in when it happened and not in a Petri dish using modern biology
-
Evolution doesn't state all life evolved from one single single celled organism. It states all life evolved from single organism[b][i][u]s[/u][/i][/b]. The question of how the first single celled life forms came to be isn't part of evolution.
-
It's the first step and you can't even answer that so why try to go any farther it's already proven false
-
Did you not read the links? Because apparently you didn't. And no, its not proven false, as youre combining two separate questions and looking for one answer.
-
I read them but unlike you I actually comprehended what it said
-
I'm sure.
-
Miller Urey experiment. look it up.
-
Didn't produce nothing fact
-
Little did he know.... We have created amino acids from non life. Aka, building blocks of life.
-
So I'm right then
-
No, even if we created life right now in a lab. Which we pretty much have. It doesn't matter becuase that doesn't have anything to do with Evolution. That is abiogenisis. Evolution is a process that happens when life [i]already[/i] exists.
-
No they have not, even facts can't stop your ignorance
-
Ad hominem.
-
No, no you are not.