-
Edited by Sailor Mars: 6/4/2015 1:24:03 AMI heard they were on better terms and talking with Bethesda after the Metacritic fiasco so I thought maybe they would bring them in to do it while they focused on TES. Guess not.
-
Guessing you havent played fallout 3? 3 was better than NV and obsidian had no part in it.
-
New Vegas is objectively better than 3.
-
I suppose, I thought New Vegas felt like less of a wasteland game and more like a western game with some futuristic weapons with fallout enemies thrown in. It was still a great game, just didn't feel like a true fallout to me
-
Have you played the original games? Fallout 3 wasn't even canon. NV had much more quests to do. 3 did have a scarier feel, but remember this is over 200 years after the war. In 3 it looked like it happened 20 years ago.
-
With the addition of the FEV in the radiation, imagination takes precedence over logistics, as the Forced Evolutionary Virus is fictional, and therefor has fictional effects. In summation, people need to get the -blam!- over the green hue. Fallout 4 doesn't appear to have much anyways; all is well. Love, a Fanboy.
-
I never had the chance to tbh, so I suppose I cant really talk but I liked the feel of Fallout 3 mors than New Vegas, and I assume 4 will be closer to former rather than the latter.
-
That is up in the air. It will most likely be similar to 3 for atmosphere, but hopefully they learned how to make a morally grey world, from obsidian. The main problem with 3 is that it was so blatantly black and white. There were only two factions and if you sided with one in the end you were evil. If you sided with the other you were good. Also you hardly impacted the rest of the game, except for the ending in 3.
-
I do agree with that, your choices in New Vegas really did impact the wasteland.
-
Just trying to spread neckbeard justice to the true sequel of Fallout 2