People are always arguing that only science or a God can be true. Not both, but why not both? I mean how could all that we know as our universe just "BE" without atleast a small nudge from a God? Perhaps he set things in motion and then took a step back to let things naturally run their course?
I'm not very religious and i don't know the bible inside and out, but wasn't the sun created on like the 3rd day or something to that effect?
And if we use the sun to tell what is 1 day, then couldn't the first days have been thousands or millions of years?
Just a thought...
Like i said i'm not that religious so i'm sure i'm missing things, but maybe some of you guys can offer some more knowledgable opinions?
-
If you take some particular claim like "God created the universe", there are a couple of fundamental issues with it: 1. It presupposes God's existence; and 2. There is no evidence to suggest God did Scientifically the hypothesis - the original claim - cannot be tested because it is [url=http://www.logicallyfallacious.com/index.php/logical-fallacies/179-unfalsifiability]unfalsifiable[/url]. However, [b]this does not mean the conclusion is either "yes" or "no"[/b], it means there is no conclusion at all (see: [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_hypothesis]null hypothesis[/url]). So, when people say things like "science disproves God" or "science proves God", you can just reject everything they say as unsubstantiated.