I don't see how any of this disproves creationism, unless you are referring to a literal interpretation of an Aramaic god. AKA Earth created in 7 days.
English
-
Assuming you mean disproves, it helps disprove it. But, since creationists are stubborn as all Hell, and are the equivalent of little children covering their ears and yelling "LALALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!", you're right, this will do very little to "disprove" evolution in their eyes.
-
Wut. Prove creationism?
-
Pardon the typo. I meant to say "disproves".
-
It is showing how we are closer to understanding how the first life came from organic molecules.
-
I know.
-
Then what's the issue?
-
I had to look up what the common interpretation of creationism is. In terms of taking the events portrayed in the old testament literally, then yes it proves creationism wrong, though that a been done ages ago. As for disproving the existence of a higher power, not even close.
-
Of course. Nothing can prove or disprove a higher power.