JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

4/9/2015 3:58:10 PM
1
The fossil record, genetics, and chemistry have the evidence. Regardless of your acceptance or denial, that is the evidence. Its empirical evidence, regardless of how you want to skew the definition, and like all evidence it must be interpreted, because that is how conclusions are formed, and information learned. If you deny that conclusion, which has been accepted by the scientific community due to it holding up over time, and only gaining support from new information, then I can't help you. It seems that youre not trying to dispute evolution, you trying to dispute me. I didn't prove evolution, its been proven long before I learned about it. I'm simply sharing known information, that you have access to, just as I do. If you dispute it, fine. But show why, other than "that doesn't meet my made up standard". Have the last word, because that's all you care about. You don't care how dumb you sound, or how much you evade questions, or your failure to back up anything you claim. You care about the last word. So have it. Its meaningless.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Sorry, but your interpretation of empirical data, is separate from the empirical data itself. There's nothing empirical about your assumptions. It's never been observed, a microbe becoming a man. If you can provide real empirical proof, that is observable or testable, that isn't completely dependent on bias interpretation or assumption, I'd like to see it. Thanks.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon