Everything in this video is easily debunked. He's trying to use middle school level science texts that present things in a simplified version to be easily understood, and use misrepresentation of information to discredit them. He's not disproving anything, and consistently assets the answer "I don't know" by science, is evidence for god. Your video is bad, and you should feel bad.
I like how this guy picks and chooses his arguments without referencing a bigger picture. If he had given examples of what we know about how chemicals and physics work, his entire premise and all of his assertions would be mostly debunked. He does have valid points and there is nothing wrong with not knowing something. The issue with a woodpecker's transitional fossils could be explained simply by conditions that weren't conducive to fossilization.
Your role as a moderator enables you immediately ban this user from messaging (bypassing the report queue) if you select a punishment.
7 Day Ban
7 Day Ban
30 Day Ban
Permanent Ban
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
close
Our policies have recently changed. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
Our policies have recently changed. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.