{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/13/2013 4:09:09 PM
8
Or console gamers are smart enough to know PC gaming will result in expensive upgrades to their PC almost every year and get the just as good performing console instead.
English
-
lol hillarious I have a gtx 680 and a 2700k intel running at 4.4 Ghz Hardware is so far ahead of software that i wont have to upgrade anything, especially not my GPU, for at least 3 years.
-
Lolno. Not with a new generation coming out.
-
Itt people that still don't get it. Right now a gtx 560 can still run all the games on the market. I wont need to upgrade because even though 3 years from now there will probably be the 800 series. my 680 will still run ever game on the market. Software won't catch up to today's hardware for years.
-
You're really overestimating your hardware. Whenever a new console comes out, there's a massive jump in requirements & after about 1-2 years, practically every single card on the market pre-console is obselete if you want a proper experience. inb4 but my gtx680 cost me $500; so did some shitty 32mb graphics card when the Xbox 360 came out.
-
Edited by DocSmurf: 1/13/2013 11:19:25 PMYour grossly underestimating the hardware and seriously overestimating the change in graphics demand. I'm guna try to explain this to you one last time. Under a DirectX 11 heaven benchmark at full Settings under high AA and Extreame Tesselation I only use 60 percent of my Vram. And that's running under ridiculous setting no gaming company would ever put out at default because no one but enthusiast could play it. I will not have to upgrade my GPU for atleast 3 to 4 years simply because graphics in videogames isn't going to jump any more than it already has for sake of sales potential and cost effectiveness
-
^Proof that the publisher is right
-
You don't need to upgrade every year.
-
And so it begins. . .
