Socialism becomes increasingly more viable the less humans are involved in labor. Communism, at least the communist state, is not great. I mean, neither is capitalism. It just so happens, however, that capitalism is basically the best to meet the production levels required to sustain a large population while utilizing human labor. Even if that means thousands of chinese children go starved and exhausted to make us our nike shoes.
English
-
Don't bring up capitalism and then try and bring in (wholly wrong, mind you) examples from a failed Maoist police state as evidence against capitalism. It takes a certain kind of lunacy to do that.
-
Oh, you're right, I forgot. American businesses totally don't rely on that at all, no. They can easily afford to pay all their workers ubiquitous amounts of money. It's like, inequality isn't a necessary function of capitalism or anything. Never mind the fact that the only reason people aren't still working industrial revolution hours in factories in America is because of off shoring. Oh, gee.
-
We dont have a capitalist economy to make that judgement. Currently nobody is allowed to pay low wages by law. I still don't see the relevance to capitalism by any definition other than the one your deranged mindset is conjuring up.
-
Oh my goodness, you're right again. Capitalism is a lie. Nations, with many different laws and regulations, don't interact economically, and corporations most certainly don't!
-
Interacting economically = capitalism? I think that...yep...just about anyone with an iota of knowledge about economics would disagree with. Open a book.