Well I'll be darned, I was wrong. Shoot me. I'm guessing the basic calculator I used messed up the indices. But my scientific and graphic calculators are at the other end of the house, and I was even too lazy to wait for Classic to start up to run the Graphing Calculator on this computer. All my constants were correct, it just got broken in the processing. I promise I'll never do it again. :) I've recalculated my age to actually be 4.13531x10^51. As God would say, I apologise for the inconvenience. And anyway, how many other people have posted their [i]real[/i] age here? ;) - Reiginko [Edited on 6/6/2005]