JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

#Halo

8/3/2010 4:33:36 AM
393

New Halo the Fall of Reach has Canon problems

In the new version there it states that reach comes under attack at 2542 and not 2552. the battles for Sigama Octanus and Reach are now 2542 Cole is now a Fleet Admiral in 2530 Admiral Stanforth is now a Vice Admiral 700+ ships attacked reach [Edited on 08.03.2010 1:53 PM PDT]

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • Was reading this thread last night before it got the Golden Seventh column. Here I am on my lunch break and skipped through pages to see if a Bungie employee could shed some light on this horrible mess... only to see Urk called us nerds. We NEED to hear something from 343. We need some clarification. I say we make a petition to 343 asking them to fix what they've screwed up or explain themselves. What I don't get in the first place is why they would even re-release the book. The original Fall of Reach is my absolute favorite book despite is minor inconsistencies (which I like to think happened because of a publishing mistake.) Who's down to write something up for 343? I'd do it but I'm about to go back to work for the next five hours.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

1 2
You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon