For all of you who aren't familiar with dihydrogen oxide, it is one of the most unspoken deadly chemical in the United States. Highly addictive it kills 75% of the people who are in withdrawal from it withing 3 days. It is a leading ingredient to the accelerated growth of GMO crops in conjunction with fossilized fertilizers. If inhaled it could cause death and exposure to the skin can cause burning and blisters. In time everyone who is exposed to dihydrogen oxide will die. Bungie has taken a subtle but serious stance to this chemical, "We [creative team at Bungie] all knew it was there but we are a entertainment and gaming company. We didn't want to polarize or alienate our audience on a political issue, so we decided to make a subtle yet straight forward statement about how deadly it is... " Deej In butcher houses diseased and cancerous animals are dissected and all of them are found to have dihydrogen oxide in the tissue of these animals. Recent research ties it to the production of Nuclear energy. Some wonder if dihydrogen oxide from Nuclear plants are infiltration our eco system and causing these cancers and strange growth in animals. So how has Bungie taken a stance. "There are a few ways to "kill" yourself in the game. Rockets, grenades, jumping of a cliff, or shooting yourself when your in dihydrogen oxide." It is a killer and we [Creative team at Bungie] wanted to make that clear. Some have called it the dihydrogen oxide glitch or trick but it was not a accident that it was in the game. It is a statement of how deadly this chemical can be." Deej Don't get me wrong, dihydrogen oxide occurs in the natural world, and it can be just as destructive and deadly but to introduce it into US manufacturing and home where children have easy access to it is intolerable. TAKE A STANCE AND BUMP this topic if you agree!!!!! Or just give me a like. Edit [spoiler]Though the true scientific name is dihydrogen monoxide, it isn't uncommon to the leave "mon or mono" off and I chose to do so. I felt it made the title flow better. If I was going for true accuracy the article would have been written much differently.[/spoiler]