{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/3/2014 8:21:45 PM
2
I wish I could say it's good and helping bungie... but, I don't think it actually is helping. And while some complaints are just that, complaints, others are still legitimate concerns that people have with the game. I'll admit, I don't mind having to redo an Exotic here or there, HOWEVER it would be much easier for them to just add an additional few Damage Upgrade nodes, or some other change. Some of the changes they did, I liked. But others are just game elongation, or making the game seem much more complex than it needs to be. Personally, if they're continuing with these kinds of changes, I'm probably gonna let Destiny drop off the radar for awhile. I feel like others should too if they REALLY want change, because complaining about it probably won't do much.
English
-
[quote]HOWEVER it would be much easier for them to just add an additional few Damage Upgrade nodes, or some other change.[/quote] Tbh, I think they are actually doing the easiest thing, for them. I haven't seen any other portion of the game where nodes are added or removed, which implies that their current code doesn't support this feature (It might, who knows, I'm just guessing based on observation). [i]If[/i] that's actually true, then the vendor system would default to being the best time investment, development wise. It's essentially duplicating a spreadsheet entry, and then adding vendor data/requirements to it. Done. I can't imagine a better conversion of dev time, for this issue. Also, they don't have any of the theoretical unforeseen bugs/consequences, associated with code changes, to deal with.
-
I agree but many time people are saying needs a buff or nerf and when it happens they complain that it's to strong or weak... It's annoying and I think many others agree
