{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/10/2014 1:30:25 PM
7
-
Wrong definition of pay to win. Try again, what was described is not pay to win at all.
-
You are very ignorant. What was described is pay to win. I worked my ass of to get 10,000 glimmer for a badass gun. You swiped $20 off your card and got a better one. Now I'm left wanting. It'll take me days to earn what you paid for in seconds. P2W
-
Nope. Pay to get item faster, is not pay to win. If you had to spend $$ to get the weapon that does +5 damage more than a weapon in game. That is Pay to win.
-
No you are getting into the semantics of microtransactions. And if this system was introduced. Pay exclusive guns would obviously be implemented. That's business. Pay to have an extreme advantage seems close enough to p2w for me to think your idea is pathetic. Just buy a different game because you can't commit.
-
Yes I am against paying to have a weapon that does more damage than what I can find in the game. That is pay to win. But paying to get glimmer, nah nothing wrong with that since I can farm glimmer all day long.
-
Yes and you need to farm glimmer all day long just like everyone who thinks it's stupid to swipe a credit card cause you can't go play a strike a few times.
-
Sure it may be stupid, but it is not pay to win. That is the only point I'm making. :)
